6. Listening: Head Space

Erik Satie dreamed of his music being played everywhere. Today we listen as we go about our business. 

Portable, pre-recorded audio allows us to “tune” the environment we inhabit. This creates a first-person, user-defined sonic ambience or ‘furniture music’, that can accompany or facilitate other activities that one might be involved in. 

Simon Killer [2012] dir. Antonio Campos

Headphones untether us from fixed speaker systems and computers. They allow us to augment our everyday embodied experience with a private, internal soundtrack.

These private and portable modes of listening can intensify the feeling of one’s own sense of subjectivity, leading to a unified, self-centric ‘soundtrack-to-my-life’ experience. In the 2012 film Simon Killer, the central character wanders the streets of Paris in his own private musical world, his headphone music functioning as a playlist of non-diegetic score for the film.

Sound vibrating in the cavity between the headphone ear-speaker and the ear masks the acoustic activity of the space one physically inhabits. Noise-cancellation technology seemingly eradicates it. Consequently headphone technology soundproofs us from the surrounding world. Michael Bull writes in Sound Moves:

“iPod culture concerms the seamless joining together of experiences in a flow, unifying the complex, contradictory and contingent nature of the world beyond the user […] Users report that iPod experience is at its most satisfying when no external sound seeps into their world to distract them from their dominant and dominating vision.”

Sound in the headphones vibrates in the private space of the individual listener. Conversely, sound in the cinema vibrates in the shared space of the congregated audience.

5. Listening: A Brief History of 20th Century Listening

The Sound Object

In the early 1950s, inspired by Phenomenology, French composer and engineer Pierre Schaeffer coined the term Reduced Listening to describe the new field of acousmatic research he was investigating.

“[He] gave the name reduced listening to the listening mode that focuses on the traits of the sound itself, independent of its cause and of its meaning” (Chion).

Schaeffer developed the idea of the l'objet sonore as the smallest self-contained acoustic element for analysis, categorisation, organisation and manipulation. A new magnetic tape music was born. Michel Chion writes, "concrete music, in its conscious refusal of the visual, carries with it visions that are more beautiful than images could ever be."

In developing his ideas on Reduced Listening, Schaeffer was influenced by ancient accounts of the Pythagorean order. In his book Sound Unseen: Acousmatic Sound in Theory and Practice, Brian Kane writes how:

“followers of Pythagoras underwent a three-year probationary period, directly followed by a five-year period of ‘silence’, before being admitted to Pythagoras' inner circle as mathêmatikoi (learned). The use of silence related to the protocols of rituals connected with the mystery-like instruction and religious ceremonies of the Pythagorean order. These ceremonies took place behind a veil or curtain with only those who had passed the five-year test being allowed to see their teacher face to face; the remaining students partaking acousmatically.”

Schaeffer coined the term the Acousmatique to define the listening experience of this new tape-based music that reached the listener via loudspeaker technology. The word comes from the Greek Akousmata (“oral saying”), considered to be the collection of all the sayings of Pythagoras as divine dogma.

A Purposeless Play

In America composer John Cage was interested in Eastern thought. Around the late 1940s an important influence on him was the art historian and philosopher of Indian art Ananda K. Coomaraswamy. Borrowing ideas from Coomaraswamy as well as from the Indian musician Gita Sarabhai, who Cage met in 1946, the composer claimed that the purpose of art was to imitate nature in her manner of operations. He went on to propose that the purpose of music “was to quiet and sober the mind, thus making it susceptible to divine influences”. In his 1961 book Silence: Lectures and Writings Cage famously wrote:

“Let sounds be themselves rather than vehicles for man-made theories of expressions of human sentiments.”

The Soundscape

Beginning in the late-1960s, Canadian composer R. Murray Schafer began to examine the relationship - mediated through sound - between human beings and their environment. This led to the development of Acoustic Ecology and Soundscape studies at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver. Schafer referred to the Soundscape as an acoustic environment consisting of events heard, rather than objects seen. In his 1977 book The Tuning of the World, Schafer describes Hi-Fi soundscapes as those spaces that preserve sonic clarity and perspective as a result of low background noise. Lo-Fi soundscapes on the other hand are found in loud, busy urban centres where there is “no distance, only presence”.

Writing in the early 1990s, electroacoustic composer Barry Truax, who along with Schafer was one of the original members of the Vancouver soundscape project, describes the variance in contextuality of acoustic sounds when compared with their electronic reproductions:

“In the acoustic world, sound is constrained by being tied to its context, in relation to which it derives at least part of its meaning. In the electroacoustic world, sound can be taken out of its original context and put via a loudspeaker into any other, where its meaning may be contradictory to that environment.”

For Schafer, the splitting of sound from source is a pathological (“schizophonic”) product of modern technology and mass urbanisation.

Deep Listening

In 1989 composer Pauline Oliveros coined the term Deep Listening to describe a radical practice of auditory attentiveness. She writes:

“Deep Listening involves going below the surface of what is heard, expanding to the whole field of sound while finding focus. This is the way to connect with the acoustic environment, all that inhabits it, and all that there is.”

Oliveros shared Cage and Schaeffer's interest in attending to the sounds themselves. However, she was also actively engaged in the neuroscience of various meditation practices, as well as the wider ecological field of all acoustic activity; the study of the relationships between living organisms, including humans, and their physical environment.

4. Listening: Three Modes of Listening

Michel Chion has described three listening modes: 

  1. Causal Listening - listening in order to gather information about its cause.

  2. Semantic Listening - referring to the interpretation of a code or language.

  3. Reduced Listening - a focus on the sound themselves, independent of its cause and meaning. 

These three modes of listening involve directed attention; the active and conscious choice to process sounds in order to grasp an understanding.

Conversely, hearing is the act of perceiving sounds indiscriminately.

The cinema is a site for both listening and hearing; active auditory attention and ambient reception.

3. Listening: The Real and the Realist

According to Robert Bresson the cacophony of reality captured in the filmmaking process must be tamed. Therefore the unwanted sounds detected by the microphone must be somehow controlled. This requires a team of sound editors and mixers tasked with organising the placement and level of individual sounds in order to bring definition and shape to the soundtrack.

During the 1960s Jean-Luc Godard explored some of the aesthetics of the Cinéma Vérité approach to documentary-filmmaking. In his 1962 film Vivre Sa Vie, Godard intentionally avoids any post-production voice replacement or studio sound effects. Instead, he records all voices and location sounds directly on to a single unedited track of tape.

Vivre Sa Vie [1962] dir. Jean-Luc Godard

Writing about the film at the time, author and film theorist Jean Collet said:

“Jean-Luc Godard’s idea was simple: apply to the sound the same demands as to the pictures. Capture life—in what it offers to be seen and heard—directly [...] The interest offered by this method is obvious: the director opts for the real rather than the realistic. Being “realistic” always implies having a point of view on what is real, an interpretation of the facts. Here, an attempt has been made, thanks to the special machines used, to establish a material point of view rather than a human judgment. The microphone is capturing what it picks up, just as the camera is, and the artist avoids intervening at this level of the creation.”

2. Listening: Signal and Noise

In Information Theory the signal represents any meaningful information one is trying to detect. The noise component is the random, unwanted variation or fluctuation that interferes with the signal. 

If the intentional sound of a film is the signal, then the noise is all sounds that the filmmaker wishes to reject.

Noise inevitably emerges through the filmmaking process. Noise is also present during public screenings.

1. Listening: Attention

Conventional approaches to film sound work are concerned with attention.

Auditory Neuroscientist Seth S. Horowitz writes that “the difference between the sense of hearing and the skill of listening is attention.” Attention is the faculty that joins us to the world.

The filmmaker orchestrates the various component parts of the soundtrack in order to direct the spectator/auditor’s attention to what is intended to be heard at any particular moment in time.

In film we both look and see, listen and hear.

Introduction

There is something to confess: your speaker likes to leave a movie theater. Back out on the more or less empty, more or less brightly lit sidewalk (it is invariably at night, and during the week, that he goes), and heading uncertainly for some cafe or other, he walks in silence (he doesn’t like discussing the film he’s just seen), a little dazed, wrapped up in himself, feeling the cold - he’s sleepy, that’s what he’s thinking, his body has become something sopitive, soft, limp, and he feels a little disjointed, even (for a moral organization, relief comes only from this quarter) irresponsible. In other words, obviously, he’s coming out of hypnosis. (Leaving the Movie Theater, Roland Barthes)

Film is considered a visual medium. It is something we watch.

Moving images framing auditory attenion, film as a sound art, the cinema as a shared listening space.

At the intersection between film, sound and experimental music, The Cinema of Noise research project aims to explore film as something that we listen to; a sonic experience unique to the cinema.

Part 1: The Cinema as Listening Space: Embodied Listening

Part 2: Film as a Sonic Medium: Compelled to Listen